Sciagraph vs. Fil
Fil is a free, open-source memory profiler for Python. It shares some design goals with Sciagraph, but is also different in many ways.
| Fil | Sciagraph | |
|---|---|---|
| Use case | Data processing, but can also be used for any Python application | Data processing only |
| Offline development | ✅ | ✅ |
| Production | ❌ | ✅ |
| Memory profiling | ✅ | ✅ with some limitations: uses sampling, so not useful for applications allocating <100MB RAM |
| Multiprocessing support | ❌ | ✅ |
| Performance profiling | ❌ | ✅ |
| Runtime overhead | Up to 40-50% | Negligible to ~5% |
| Supported platforms | Linux, macOS | Linux, macOS |
| Pricing | Open source, unlimited free use | Commercial software. Limited free plan, paid plans |
In more detail:
- Fil is open source, unlike Sciagraph.
- Sciagraph has performance profiling; Fil does not, it only does memory profiling.
- If you purchase the appropriate plan, Sciagraph can be used in production, unlike Fil.
- Fil can track much smaller memory allocations because it tracks all allocations; Sciagraph uses sampling so will only work well on applications that use more memory (100MB and up).